Too late. Apple has destroyed it.

I just got my first ARM Mac to replace my work Win machine (what has MS done to Windows!?!? :'()

Used to be I could type "display" and Id get right to display settings in settings. Now it shows thousands of useless links to who knows what. Instead I have to type "settings" and then, within settings, type "display"

Still better than the Windows shit show.

Honestly, a well setup Linux machine has better user experience than anything on the market today.

▲

9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

chaostheory 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> a well setup Linux machine has better user experience than anything on the market today

We probably have to preface that with “for older people”. IMO Linux has changed less UX wise than either Windows or MacOS in recent years

▲

adrian_b 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Even if the degradation of the user interfaces is noticed especially by older people, I doubt that this has anything to do with them being old and I believe that it is caused only by them being more experienced, i.e. having seen more alternatives for user interfaces.

For several decades, I have used hundreds of different computers, from IBM mainframes, DEC minicomputers and early PCs with Intel 8080 or Motorola MC6800 until the latest computers with AMD Zen 5 or Intel Arrow Lake. I have used a variety of operating systems and user interfaces.

During the first decades, there has been a continuous and obvious improvement in user interfaces, so I never had any hesitation to switch to a new program with a completely different user interface for the same application, even every year or every few months, whenever such a change resulted in better results and productivity.

Nevertheless, an optimum seems to have been reached around 20 years ago, and since then more often than not I see only worse interfaces that make harder to do what was simpler previously, so there is no incentive for an "upgrade".

Therefore I indeed customize my GUIs in Linux to a mode that resembles much more older Windows or MacOS than their recent versions and which prioritizes instant responses and minimum distractions over the coolest look.

In the rare occasions when I find a program that does something in a better way than what I am using, I still switch immediately to it, no matter how different it may be in comparison with what I am familiar, so conservatism has nothing to do with preferring the older GUIs.

	▲	pwg 8 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> Nevertheless, an optimum seems to have been reached around 20 years ago, and since then more often than not I see only worse interfaces that make harder A consequence of having "UI designers" paid on salary instead of individual contract jobs that expire when the specific fix is complete. In order to preserve their continuing salary, the UI designers have to continue making changes for changes sake (so that the accounting dept. does not begin asking: "why are we paying salary for all these UI designers if they are not creating any output"). So combining reaching an optimum 20 years ago with the fact that the UI designers must make changes for the sake of change, results in the changes being sub-optimal.
	▲	Detrytus an hour ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		> Nevertheless, an optimum seems to have been reached around 20 years ago, and since then more often than not I see only worse interfaces that make harder to do what was simpler previously, so there is no incentive for an "upgrade". “I've come up with a set of rules that describe our reactions to technologies: 1. Anything that is in the world when you’re born is normal and ordinary and is just a natural part of the way the world works. 2. Anything that's invented between when you’re fifteen and thirty-five is new and exciting and revolutionary and you can probably get a career in it. 3. Anything invented after you're thirty-five is against the natural order of things.” Douglas Adams
	▲	chaostheory 8 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I believe it’s more about familiarity and being more resistant to change both good and bad

▲

ff2400t 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Because of Linux's Fragmentation there are so many different UI being created right now and so much more experimentation. There is KDE with endless customization, Gnome for the people who are okay with a more opinionated UI, Cosmic the completely new Desktop Environment and of course the good old lxde. I have to use Windows at work these day and every single one of these makes the Windows feel like it's more suited for Old People because of how slow it can be.

	▲	tempest_ 7 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Does KDE have endless customization? I just installed Plasma with Endevouros and use it. I used Cinnamon before it. They don't require much effort.
	▲	chaostheory 8 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Yes but most people just fire up the distro, UI, and settings that they’re most comfortable with for their daily driver. People can and often keep things the same

▲

pxoe 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

>windows shit show

And yet on Windows 11, hit Win key, type display, it immediately shows display settings as the first result.

	▲	elcritch 6 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Followed by 5 ads and a link to use copilot! ;)
	▲	maccard 7 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		Unless it decides to update your search results to search for “Display” with bing in Edge, despite edge not being my browser.
	▲	rngfnby 8 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[dead]