| ▲ | cubefox 11 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Here is a more recent comparison with Intel's new Panther Lake chips: https://www.tomsguide.com/computing/cpus/panther-lake-is-int... | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dagmx 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Which still come out behind other than multi core, while using substantially more power. Those panther lake comparisons are from the top end PTL to the base M series. If they were compared to their comparative SKUs they’d be even further behind. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | sys_64738 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Are the Intel systems plugged in when running those tests? Usually when Apple machines do the tests then the difference between battery/plugged in is small if any. | |||||||||||||||||||||||