It really shouldn't be this hard to just provide one piece of evidence. Is anecdotes of toy internal greenfield projects that could probably be built with a drag and drop no-code editor really the best from this LLM revolution?

▲

Mtinie 3 hours ago | parent [-]

What is your bar for “useful”? Let’s start there and we’ll see what evidence can be offered.

User count? Domain? Scope of development?

You have something in mind, obviously.

	▲	bopbopbop7 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		If you're asking me to define a very clear bar, it's obvious nothing cleared it. Anything that proves that LLMs increase software quality. Any software built with an LLM that is actually in production, survives maintenance, doesn't have 100 CVEs, that people actually use.