Remix.run Logo
alephnerd 5 hours ago

[flagged]

axpy906 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The scariest party is the uniparty.

seneca 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Every post you make on this site is essentially the exact same H1B propaganda. It's tiresome to watch someone use this community like this.

sunshowers 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Migrating to a place where people can contribute more to society is both a core tenet of individual liberty and one of the most positive-sum things any human being can do.

But given that you both feign concern over visa holders' working conditions [1], while at the same time advocating for policies that lead to worse working conditions [2], perhaps you just hate freedom and were never acting in good faith in the first place.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45656527

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45323501

alephnerd 4 hours ago | parent [-]

It's just the process of learning the hard way that not heeding the warnings everyone gave is painful.

Now that they're facing consequences which we warned about (and prepped for as a result) they want to ignore it thinking that the monsters under the bed will go away.

Brain drain somewhere is brain gain elsewhere.

alephnerd 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Barely a couple weeks ago resorting to H1B bashing was the norm on HN. Now that the chickens have come home to roost you want to ignore it.

seneca 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I don't want to ignore anything. The H1B fee changes were a half-measure that didn't go nearly far enough.

alephnerd 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

And my point is those "half measures" have already incentivized us to offshore even more than before. Going with "full measures" will only further incentivize us to go ExAmerica.

seneca 4 hours ago | parent [-]

That assumes that policies can't be put in place to control the incentives such that they prioritize American companies hiring American employees.

alephnerd 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

What policies lol.

We lobbied where we needed to. Now we're bankrolling Trump's Venezuela [0] and "Drill Baby Drill" [1] policy and bankrolling Iowa [2] and Montana GOP's [3] agricultural exports. We also greenlit multiple Trump Towers projects [4][5][6][7].

This is how a trade war is fought.

Policymaking is always secondary to politics. That's why I left the policy space to climb the ladder in business.

[0] - https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/indias-reliance-talk...

[1] - https://www.livemint.com/companies/ongc-exxonmobil-collabora...

[2] - https://governor.iowa.gov/press-release/2025-09-16/gov-reyno...

[3] - https://www.daines.senate.gov/2026/01/20/daines-travels-to-i...

[4] - https://www.trump.com/residential-real-estate-portfolio/trum...

[5] - https://www.trump.com/residential-real-estate-portfolio/trum...

[6] - https://www.trump.com/residential-real-estate-portfolio/trum...

[7] - https://www.trump.com/residential-real-estate-portfolio/trum...

sunshowers 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

seneca 4 hours ago | parent [-]

What a childish argument.

sunshowers 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I need you to understand that immigration controls are fundamentally and inherently antithetical to freedom of speech, freedom of movement, and freedom of association. And this applies both to immigrants and to citizens.

Imagine if you needed government approval to live with the one you love! What a completely unreasonable intervention into the private lives of ordinary people. Oh wait, that's the actual reality immigrants live in.

seneca 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes, I see, you don't believe in countries or borders. I disagree with you, fundamentally, as do basically all Americans.

sunshowers an hour ago | parent [-]

I believe that countries and borders exist as a descriptive fact about the world. But I also believe that it's impossible to square immigration control regimes with any robust notion of freedom and liberty, and also that there isn't room for much disagreement on this specific point once you understand the intrinsic nature of such regimes. See Kukathas, Immigration and Freedom for more.

I know most people (of any nationality, not just Americans) don't understand this, but you and I are not most people. I believe things because it is correct to believe them, not because most people believe them (or not).

edit: to be clear, you can say "immigration control lessens freedom, but I'm willing to give up freedom—both yours and mine—because I value certain things more". That is a reasonable point, though I might as a follow-up probe into the motivation behind that. "I think the government gets to stop you from living with your spouse, but I'm okay with that because XYZ" better have a pretty robust XYZ behind it!

churchill 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

apapkka 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

dyauspitr 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Really? With all the H1B discussion on this site you prefer if it were completely one sided?

leosanchez 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

dyauspitr 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It’s not irrelevant to this discussion considering 50% of our unicorns are immigrant founded.

alephnerd 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

When you are Asian American, the conversation is deeply personal.

And I feel pointing out how a commonly repeated trope in our industry is backfiring is important.

Alternatively, you can bury your heads into the deeper and deeper hole that is being dug.