| ▲ | 1vuio0pswjnm7 2 hours ago | |
I have zero problems with the terseness of the k language, the names of the source files nor the source code they contain I find brevity easier to work with. I wish all software was like that I like the shell (ash not bash). I like assembly language I have to "adjust" to verbosity, and sometimes I honestly can't, it's paralyzing to the brain, terseness feels more natural Why not name scripts in natural language like an LLM prompt perhaps (I don't use LLMs so pardon the ignorance), with spaces and punctuation Bash allows it
That might make sense if I was using the scripts to communicate with a another person, or if I intended other persons besides me to use the scriptsBut neither of those things is true. The scripts are for communicating with a computer and are intended to be used only by me UNIX allows anyone to rename any file to whatever they want. The UNIX user is free to pursue their own preferences in naming, whatever those may be | ||