I dont really understand how this is possible. I've built some very large applications, and even a full LLM data curation,tokenizer, pretrain, posttrain SFT/DPO pipeline with LLM's and it most certainly took far less time than if i had done it manually. Sure it isnt all optimal...but it most certainly isnt subpar, and it is fully functional

▲

Ocha 4 hours ago | parent [-]

So you skipped the code review and just checked that it does what you needed it to do?

▲

TideAd 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

GPT-5 codex variants with xhigh reasoning make great code reviewers.

	▲	SamPatt an hour ago \| parent [-]
		5.2 Codex is excellent at reviewing commits. I haven’t used 5.3, I assume it's as good or better. Especially for large commits, it's become indispensable.

▲

enraged_camel 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I don't know how anyone can make this assumption in good faith. The poster did not imply anything along those lines.

	▲	joshuahaglund 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		That looked like a leading question to me, asking for confirmation but not an outright assumption. Seems like a fair question