Other than Guile as in different Scheme implementations? It's usually not too difficult to port things between Schemes. Especially if you use standard R6RS or R7RS library syntax.

▲

noosphr 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Guiles debugging has been a nightmare in the 3.x series. Which is rather surprising since it was probably the easiest scheme to debug in the 1.x days.

It got so bad I moved to racket as my daily driver.

▲

wwfn 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Can you say more? Guile's the only scheme I've tried (attempts at packaging for Guix). Debugging has been difficult, but I figured it was me struggling with new tools and API. Does racket have better facilities for introspection or discovery at the REPL?

	▲	pjmlp 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Yes, since years, all the way when it was still known as Dr. Scheme. It has a graphical experience similar to the survivors from Lisp is Great days, like LispWorks and Allegro Common Lisp, or Clojure with Cursive.

▲

pjmlp 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Even better than PLT Scheme with Dr. Scheme, now Raket has ever been?

I have my doubts, given its age.

▲

feastingonslop 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Which LLM works best for Racket?

	▲	davidelettieri 22 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I found gemini 3 pro to be pretty good. Overall understanding of the code, code generation capabilities and ability to explain are all pretty good.

▲

NeutralForest 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

A different scheme that has great debugging and testing and also better docs.