>My spouse worked for years in that sort of daycare

Was your spouse also one of the all-male crews that those totally-not-a-scam MN daycares typically have?

How many legit daycares have you ever seen where the staff is all men? And aggressive men at that. Just think about it for 3 seconds.

Now you are going off topic. I suspect because you don't like a reasonable answer that doesn't fit your fraud narrative.

Men can work at daycares but also we have no clue what those guys relationship to the business was.

Just think about it for 3 seconds.

	▲	joe_mamba 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		>Now you are going off topic. [...] Men can work at daycares No mate, YOU are going offtopic. I never said men CAN'T work daycares, I asked you "How many legit daycares have you ever seen where the staff is ALL-MEN?". This is the n'th time in this thread you misread what I say, to the point I can confidently say you're intentionally doing this in bad faith to derail the conversation, which is why this will be my last reply to you. > also we have no clue what those guys relationship to the business was. Except they also interviewed MN citizens who live in the area who also said they never saw any kids or women at that daycare with the misspelled "Learing" sign. How many more points on the graph that form a line do you need to admit that it's an obvious scam? >I suspect because you don't like a reasonable answer that doesn't fit your fraud narrative. I just look at the evidence and use critical thinking to judge. You're the one not bringing any evidence to support your not-a-scam narrative and intentionally misreading my questions to give bad faith offtopic answers. >Just think about it for 3 seconds. Parroting someone is flattering but not a sign of good arguing skills.