This makes me wonder if Amazon the retailer requires having access to AWS services “at cost” in order to be profitable. If AWS was spun out completely, would Amazon proper be able to afford their AWS bill of AWS had a profit margin on it.

I’m sure Amazon.com would be fine, but it would take a chunk out of their margins. I’m also sure that their X% ownership of the spun out AWS would cover the difference.

▲

mekdoonggi a day ago | parent | next [-]

Consider the reverse. If AWS didn't have a large guaranteed customer in the form of Amazon, would they still be able to develop their products with perfect knowledge of the needs?

	▲	ivan_gammel 21 hours ago \| parent [-]
		If AWS becomes a separate business now, they may be able to build better products, given a bit less focus on one large customer (Idk if Amazon.com has any priority in their product roadmaps now)

▲

moralestapia 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I don't have the answer but this question has an answer, as Amazon's earning reports are public.

▲

erfburfl 21 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]