| ▲ | cadamsdotcom 10 hours ago | |
Mad props on building with Claude Code but doing thoughtful design, and using tests to take yourself out of the loop but still thoughtfully architecting the important bits. These tools can’t architect clean solutions that cut out massive chunks of code, and they can’t talk to users and decide whether what they’re building makes sense. For that, we need a human touch. But coding agents grant insane leverage if they’re just told when they got it wrong and given a chance to get it right. | ||
| ▲ | bsgeraci 4 hours ago | parent [-] | |
I think we are in a time where we can make amazing things happen. I always go back to my Star Trek shows. We can now ask a computer to make a program for us. That is what I have been dreaming of. Now we are not at that level and lots of thought and experience goes into helping guide claude code but it is sometimes sci-fi like. The code is more clean, more maintainable for even myself. Everytihng is always commented, complexity is reduced. I think if you follow a few rules whenever making changes and using all the latest tools like linters, security checkers, end to end frameworks, and any other helpful tool you can really make stuff happen. | ||