| ▲ | VMG 7 hours ago | |||||||
Step 2: outlets slap this disclaimer on all content, regardless of AI usage, making it useless Step 3: regulator prohibits putting label on content that is not AI generated Step 4: outlets make sure to use AI for all content Let's call it the "Sesame effect" | ||||||||
| ▲ | NicuCalcea 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
This would be an improvement in my book. I'm a data journalist, and I use AI in some of my work (data processing, classification, OCR, etc.). I always disclose it in a "Methodology" section in the story. I wouldn't trust any reporting that didn't disclose the use of AI, and if an outlet slapped a disclaimer on their entire site, I wouldn't trust that outlet. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | jacquesm 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Or Step 1: those outlets that actually do the work see an increase in subscribers. | ||||||||
| ▲ | orwin 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Alternative timeline Step 2.5: 'unlike those news outlets, all our work is verified by humans' Step 3: work as intended. | ||||||||