Remix.run Logo
Llamamoe 8 hours ago

AI-written articles tend to be far more regurgitative, lower in value, and easier to ghostwrite with intent to manipulate the narrative.

Economic value or not, AI-generated content should be labeled, and trying to pass it as human-written should be illegal, regardless of how used to AI content people do or don't become.

RobotToaster 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

My theory is that AI writes the way it does because it was trained on a lot of modern (organic) journalism.

So many words to say so little, just so they can put ads between every paragraph.

charcircuit 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

That is low quality articles in general. Have you never seen how hundreds of news sites will regurgitate the same story of another. This was happening long before AI. High quality AI written articles will still be high value.

orwin 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Did you go on grokipedia at release? I still sometimes loose myself reading stuff on Wikipedia, I guarantee you that this can't happen on grok, so much noise between facts it's hard to enjoy.

charcircuit 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes I did go immediately on release. I was finally able to correct articles that have been inaccurate on Wikipedia for years.

orwin 2 hours ago | parent [-]

So you noticed how poor the prose was? Really unbearable to read.

charcircuit an hour ago | parent [-]

I found it fine to read and it handled controversial subjects much better than Wikipedia.