| ▲ | tptacek 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||
The notion that a vulnerability researcher employed by one of the highly-valued companies in the hemisphere, publishing in the open literature with their name signed to it, is on a par with a teenager in a developing nation running script-kid tools hoping for bounty payoffs. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | judemelancon an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
To preemptively clarify, I'm not saying anything about these particular researchers. Having established that, are you saying that you can't even conceptualize a conflict of interest potentially clouding someone's judgement any more if the amount of money and the person's perceived status and skill level all get increased? Disagreeing about the significance of the conflict of interest is one thing, but claiming not to understand how it could make sense is a drastically stronger claim. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | delusional 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
You don't see how thats even directionally similar? I guess I'll spell it out. One is a guy with an abundance of technology, that he doesn't know how to use, that he knows can make him money and fame, if only he can convince you that his lies are truth. The other is a bangladeshi teenager. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | drekipus an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
You have to be doing this willfully. This is obtuse | ||||||||||||||