I agree, but I've found that making an "adversarial" model within claude helps with the quality a lot. One agent makes the change, the other picks holes in it, and cycle. In the end, I'm left with less to review.

This sounds more like an automation of that idea than just N-times the work.

Glad I'm not the only one. I do the same, but I tend to have gemini be the one that critiques.

Do you do this manually? Or some abstraction above that? skills, some light orchestration, etc?