| ▲ | anigbrowl 5 hours ago | |||||||
It gets cited a lot in immigration litigation as well (eg in asylum arguments) because it's an unimpeachable factual source that the government's lawyers can't reasonably dispute. | ||||||||
| ▲ | pesus 5 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Now that you mention it, I'm pretty convinced this is the reason they took it down. If you can't dispute the facts, get rid of them, I guess. | ||||||||
| ||||||||