| ▲ | margalabargala 4 hours ago |
| I suspect they're training on this. I asked Opus 4.6 for a pelican riding a recumbent bicycle and got this. https://i.imgur.com/UvlEBs8.png |
|
| ▲ | WarmWash 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| It would be way way better if they were benchmaxxing this. The pelican in the image (both images) has arms. Pelicans don't have arms, and a pelican riding a bike would use it's wings. |
| |
| ▲ | ryandrake 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Having briefly worked in the 3D Graphics industry, I don't even remotely trust benchmarks anymore. The minute someone's benchmark performance becomes a part of the public's purchasing decision, companies will pull out every trick in the book--clean or dirty--to benchmaxx their product. Sometimes at the expense of actual real-world performance. | |
| ▲ | seanhunter 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Pelicans don’t ride bikes.
You can’t have scruples about whether or not the image of a pelican riding a bike has arms. | | |
| ▲ | jevinskie 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Wouldn’t any decent bike-riding pelican have a bike tailored to pelicans and their wings? | | |
| ▲ | actsasbuffoon an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Sure, that’s one solution. You could also Isle of Dr Moreau your way to a pelican that can use a regular bike. The sky is the limit when you have no scruples. | |
| ▲ | cinntaile 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Now that would be a smart chat agent. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | mrandish 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Interesting that it seems better. Maybe something about adding a highly specific yet unusual qualifier focusing attention? |
|
| ▲ | riffraff 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| perhaps try a penny farthing? |
