| ▲ | trash_cat 6 hours ago | |
I think the naming schemes are quite arbitrary at this point. Going to 5 would come with massive expectations that wouldn't meet reality. | ||
| ▲ | mrandish 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
After the negative reactions to GPT 5, we may see model versioning that asymptotically approaches the next whole number without ever reaching it. "New for 2030: Claude 4.9.2!" | ||
| ▲ | Squarex 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
the standard used to be that major version means a new base model / full retrain... but now it is arbitrary i guess | ||