[flagged]

kylecazar 15 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If founders (or VC's) feel comfortable working with someone who pled guilty to procuring a child for prostitution, they should go ahead. But they shouldn't then be surprised when people consider them a piece of shit.

▲

nutjob2 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

How many friends do you have that are (convicted) pedophiles?

If you had any, would you tell anyone about them?

If no, why is that?

▲

GuinansEyebrows 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

wild to try to begin a social relationship with the hn community by trying to argue this position.

▲

krapp 14 hours ago | parent [-]

I've seen this exact argument made numerous times in defense of some heinous people, or generally against "cancel culture" within tech, in favor of what they consider the political neutrality of "pure meritocracy."

If Jeffrey Epstein were a startup founder or if he had written a really important compiler or something that linked him to tech more directly, more people here would be defending him.

▲

mrguyorama 13 hours ago | parent [-]

>in favor of what they consider the political neutrality of "pure meritocracy."

Meanwhile these people often got where they were explicitly through nepotism

	▲	krapp 9 hours ago \| parent [-]
		"My father gave me a small loan of a million dollars..." - self-made millionaire and champion of the common man Donald Trump.

▲

15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

watwut 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I find it great that we now get to see what kind of men pick winners and loosers and how they operate. The fact that we now see the hypocrisy and moral rot of supposed meritocracy is not a bug.

And no, Epstein did not stopped his abuses after his network got him incredibly sweet deal and prevented further investigation. He did not even operated in secrecy after that.