| ▲ | simianwords 15 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I never got the idea of an art prodigy. It’s like treating violin as a sport but not as a beautiful medium to communicate with fellow humans. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Revolution1120 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Playing a musical instrument is far more athletic than sports, requires more scientific practice, and is more "competitive." The only difference is the scoring method. Music doesn't test "who can finish playing in the shortest time," but during practice, speeds faster or slower than the original tempo have already been practiced. Sports are about "who can push their limits"; in musical instrument playing, the very act of "practicing a complete, challenging piece" is already a limit. The difference is that it doesn't require pushing further limits. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | djtango 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There are 7 year olds[1] who can play better than I can despite 30+ years of playing piano, and even with fairly dedicated practise the progress is so much slower than someone with actual talent. I had a friend who could play all the Chopin Etudes at age 9. Some of the best art simply requires a virtuoso to bring it to life. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | wavemode 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Art still requires technique, and technique takes practice. Words like "prodigy" and "virtuoso" are typically reserved for techniques which take a large amount of practice to get right, like playing a violin. (You would never call someone a kazoo prodigy, for example.) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||