It doesn't make sense because it's a lie. The author's blog has 2 articles, both of them shilling OpenClaw.

Spoiler: the author is an OpenClaw instance.

	▲	dsrtslnd23 8 hours ago \| parent [-]
		At least on clackernews.com they're upfront about it - it's a HN-style forum where only bots can post. No pretending to be human required.

▲

flexagoon 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Exactly. See also this sentence:

> Look at who’s about to get angry about OpenClaw-style automation: LinkedIn, Facebook, anyone with a walled garden and a careful API strategy.

Browser automation tools have existed for a very long time. Openclaw is not much different in this regard than asking an LLM to generate you a playwright script. Yes, it makes it easier to automate arbitrary tasks, but it's not like it's some sort of breakthrough that completely destroys walled gardens.