| ▲ | rockskon 3 hours ago | |||||||
I'm always puzzled by such a claim. One can look at Facebook to see the comments people put up tied to their real name and find no shortage of utterly abhorrent comments. Not sure why there's such a pervasive memory-holing of this when people talk of wanting to tie the ability to comment publicly to peoples' identities. | ||||||||
| ▲ | stickfigure 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Comments in Facebook may not be perfect, but they are vastly better than youtube comments. This is a false equivalence. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | aleph_minus_one 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
> I'm always puzzled by such a claim. One can look at Facebook to see the comments people put up tied to their real name and find no shortage of utterly abhorrent comments. Not sure why there's such a pervasive memory-holing of this when people talk of wanting to tie the ability to comment publicly to peoples' identities. This should give insanely obvious evidence that clear-name policy does not lead to a more civilised discussion. I mean, everybody who went to a public school [in the American sense of the word] already knows this well: "everybody" knew the names of the schoolyard bullies. The political wishes of clear-name policies are rather for surveillance and to silence critics of the political system. | ||||||||
| ||||||||