| ▲ | drecked 3 hours ago | |
> Finally, only CIA insiders would know that officers donated some of their personal travel photos to The World Factbook, which hosted more than 5,000 photographs that were copyright-free for anyone to access and use. Isn’t this sufficient to keep it around, even if the facts themselves may be available on Wikipedia? | ||
| ▲ | sandworm101 an hour ago | parent [-] | |
Facts are, today, a threat. An encyclopedia of facts about various countries, published by a respected US agency, is dangerous. What if public policy changes? What if it is announced that there are millions of jewish people living in Iran? A CIA website claiming that there are in fact far fewer than millions would fly in the face of declared national policy. We cannot have a list of official "facts", not when new facts are being announced almost daily. How could one ever justify invading greenland to save all those penguins when the CIA's own website states that the penguin popultion of greenland increased by 27% in the last five years? | ||