| ▲ | isk517 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There was no chance that everyone would be running their own email server, but if it wasn't for the lack of IPv6 adaptation a plug and go home email server solution would probably see a decent amount of use. I'd bet we'd already be seeing it as a feature in most mid-ranged home routers by now. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | rvnx 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The mail server in a router is easy to host, the problem is: 1) Uptime (though this could be partially alleviated by retries) and most of all: 2) "Trust"/"Spam score" It's the main reason to use Sendgrid, AWS, Google, etc. Their "value" is not the email service, it's that their SMTP servers are trusted. If tomorrow I can just send from localhost instead of going through Google it's fine for me, but in reality, my emails won't arrive due to these filters. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | DiscourseFan an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For one, if my power goes out for an extended period of time I'd still like to be able to access my email. Communications really can't be hosted locally. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||