| ▲ | breakyerself 2 hours ago |
| NYT is good for games and cooking. Their news editors are garbage. |
|
| ▲ | profsummergig 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Also, it seems there are a lot of paid posts on NYT. Recently, both NYT and WP had front page articles about a book by some billionaire's daughter whose husband cheated on her. They seemed like puff-PR posts. |
| |
| ▲ | epistasis 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | This sort of nearly open corruption at NYT is worthy of a Trump operation, to be honest. When Kanye West bought a full-page ad apologizing for his anti-semitisim upon release of a new album, he apparently also bought a full-on legitimate looking "news" article to go with it: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/26/arts/music/ye-kanye-west-... This is the same newspaper that has reporters bragging on Twitter that they shouldn't have to report on major economic news, like the broad effects of the Inflation Reduction Act, because they don't need to report on anything that would benefit Biden. Apparently Biden didn't pay off the right people at the NYTimes. | | |
| ▲ | tptacek an hour ago | parent [-] | | You get that the economics underlying these claims about buying articles don't make much sense, right? The whole point of the NYT is that the newsfeed isn't the core business. | | |
| ▲ | epistasis 41 minutes ago | parent [-] | | The newsfeed doesn't need to be the core business for NYTimes to sell full-page advertisements, nor does it need to be the core business to sell stories on preferred topics. | | |
| ▲ | tptacek 36 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Sure. They could sell a lot of things that aren't core to their business. But why would they? Their next marginal dollar doesn't come from squeezing the news organization; in fact, the way things are trending, news is basically looking like it'll be a loss leader for them. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | tptacek 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| When did you last subscribe? |
| |
| ▲ | testdelacc1 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Not the other commenter, but I subscribed till November 2024. Am I allowed to say that they're garbage? | | |
| ▲ | tptacek 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | You can say whatever you'd like! It's just a useful data point. Current subscribers, former subscribers, and non-subscribers have different takes. |
| |
| ▲ | guelo 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I was a subscriber until last year. They produce outstanding journalism with the exception of their Zionist pro-war bias, which I was ok ignoring until my disgust with their genocide whitewashing became too much. | | |
|
