It's just so odd that he chose to move back to DC some time after the Bezos acquisition! It's almost as if these are unrelated events...

▲

ribosometronome 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Bezos didn't buy DC, he bought a newspaper. The commenter was saying that the decline in quality was potentially unrelated to the acquisition and then immediately compared pre and post acquisition quality. That seems like a strange way to make that point and like it might suggest that the acquisition perhaps was related to its decline in quality.

▲

fluidcruft 2 hours ago | parent [-]

The commenter said they moved back to DC in 2017 and noticed the change then.

Elementary reading skills suggest this means they lived in DC for some significant period of time prior to 2017 as a WP reader, moved away from DC for some unknown period living elsewhere as a non-WP reader, moving back to DC in 2017 when they started reading WP again.

▲

ribosometronome 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Elementary reading skills would also make it obvious that I'm not talking about their move from and back to DC. Them moving back and forth from DC is certainly irrelevant to WaPo's quality.

They noticed a decline in quality from before and after the acquisition and are using that to conclude that the acquisition didn't impact the quality of the paper. Again, that certainly seems like a strange way to make the point that the purchase didn't impact its quality.

	▲	fluidcruft an hour ago \| parent [-]
		... because they left DC before the acquisition ... and moved back to DC after the acquisition ...