| ▲ | guywithabike 3 hours ago | |||||||
The New York Times has been thriving. They're profitable and their stock is near all-time highs. If the internet killed WaPo, why didn't it kill NYTimes? | ||||||||
| ▲ | Exoristos 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
There is more to the New York Times Company than meets the eye [0]. 0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assets_owned_by_the_Ne... | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | snarf21 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
As the sibling said, papers used to make money via ads and classifieds. NYTimes pivoted to games. This gives people a reason to go to NYT every day and gives them upsell opportunities to full subscriptions. WaPo and others don't have the alternate revenue source. | ||||||||
| ▲ | gordian-mind 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
International prestige and internet-centered strategy (online games, lifestyle...). | ||||||||