> Authorities, citing a “foregone conclusion exception” to the Fifth Amendment, argued that Rawls could not invoke his right to self-incrimination because police already had evidence of a crime. The 3rd Circuit panel agreed, upholding a lower court decision.

I do not follow the logic here, what does that even mean? It seems very dubious. And what happens if one legitimately forgets? They just get to keep you there forever?

And why do they need to unlock your phone if they already proved you did the crime?

You're delusional. When ICE starts executing people on the spot for not giving up iPhone passwords, I'll eat my words.