It doesn't seem fundamentally different from a PC having multiple logins that are accessed from different passwords. Hasn't this been a solved problem for decades?

▲

bsharper 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You can have a multiuser system but that doesn't solve this particular issue. If they log in to what you claim to be your primary account and see browser history that shows you went to msn.com 3 months ago, they aren't going to believe it's the primary account.

	▲	inetknght 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		My browser history is cleared every time I close it. It's actually annoying because every site wants to "remember" the browser information, and so I end up with hundreds of browsers "logged in". Or maybe my account was hacked and that's why there's hundreds of browsers logged in.

▲

paulryanrogers 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Apple's hardware business model incentivizes only supporting one user per device.

Android has supported multiple users per device for years now.

▲

compiler-guy 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Multi-user has been solved for decades.

Multi-user that plausibly looks like single-user to three letter agencies?

Not even close.

▲

izzydata 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Doesn't having standard multi-user functionality automatically create the plausible deniability? If they tried so hard to create an artificial plausible deniability that would be more suspicious than normal functionality that just gets used sometimes.

	▲	wtallis 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		What needs to be plausibly denied is the existence of a second user account, because you're not going to be able to plausibly deny that the account belongs to you when it resides on the phone found in your pocket.