>It has always been illegal and morally reprehensible to create, own, distribute or store sexually explicit material that represents a real person without their consent, regardless if they are underage or not.

Arguably morally reprehensible but it has not always been illegal (and still isn't in many places) if you're talking about images of adults.

"Argually" morally reprehensible? I don't think that's very cash money to be honest.

This comment chain isn't about a difference of opinion, but a difference in morality - there's no debating possible about morals I think.

Did you miss the "without their consent" part?