| ▲ | koliber 4 hours ago | |||||||
Sometimes you want an artistic vase that captures some essential element of beauty, culture, or emotion. Sometimes you want a utilitarian teapot to reliably pour a cup of tea. The materials and rough process for each can be very similar. One takes a master craftsman and a lot of time to make and costs a lot of money. The other can be made on a production line and the cost is tiny. Both have are desirable, for different people, for different purposes. With software, it's similar. A true master knows when to get it done quick and dirty and when to take the time to ponder and think. | ||||||||
| ▲ | bayindirh 4 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
> Sometimes you want a utilitarian teapot to reliably pour a cup of tea. If you pardon the analogy, watch how Japanese make a utilitarian teapot which reliably pours a cup of tea. It's more complicated and skill-intensive than it looks. In both realms, making an artistic vase can be simpler than a simple utilitarian tool. AI is good at making (poor quality, arguably) artistic vases via its stochastic output, not highly refined, reliable tools. Tolerances on these are tighter. | ||||||||
| ||||||||