| ▲ | reddalo 4 hours ago | |
You can _almost_ do anything you want in the privacy of your home; but in this case Twitter was actively and directly disseminating pictures publicly on their platform. | ||
| ▲ | kimixa 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |
And profiting from it, though less directly than "$ for illegal images". Even if it wasn't behind a paywall (which it mostly is) driving more traffic for more ads for more income is still profiting from illegal imagery. | ||