| ▲ | mortarion 3 hours ago | |
Not only that. This law exists like this because of a EU directive. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2011/93/oj/eng Let me quote again: Pay attention to c.iv specifically: (c) ‘child pornography’ means: (i) any material that visually depicts a child engaged in real or simulated sexually explicit conduct; (ii) any depiction of the sexual organs of a child for primarily sexual purposes; (iii) any material that visually depicts any person appearing to be a child engaged in real or simulated sexually explicit conduct or any depiction of the sexual organs of any person appearing to be a child, for primarily sexual purposes; or (iv) realistic images of a child engaged in sexually explicit conduct or realistic images of the sexual organs of a child, for primarily sexual purposes; | ||
| ▲ | chrisjj 32 minutes ago | parent [-] | |
Thanks. I paid attention but still didn't see how: realistic images of a child engaged in sexually explicit conduct or realistic images of the sexual organs of a child, for primarily sexual purposes; covers the example in question: If you take a picture of a 14 year old girl (age of consent is 15) and use Grok to give her bikini, or make her topless, then you are most definately producing and possessing CSAM. How about you? | ||