This is accountability for the crimes of humans.

The crime is creating a system that lets schoolboys create fake nudes of other minors.

You don't just get to build a CSAM-generator and then be like "well I never intended for it to be used...".

The humans running a company are liable for the product that their company builds, easy as that.

>The crime is creating a system that lets schoolboys create fake nudes of other minors.

So like Photoshop? Do you want to raid Adobe's HQ?

Does Photoshop have a "let me jerk off to this minor" button?

Why do you want to jerk off to a minor? Sounds like you should get a visit from the police for asking a tool to do that for you.

If I ask you to go kill someone and you do it, in the eyes of the law I am just as guilty as you even though I never actually touched the person.

If you ask for CP, you're still just as guilty even if you're not the one making it.

	▲	saubeidl 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I don't want to. But I don't want others to be easily able to either. In your scenario, yes, you are guilty as well. But so is the one that actually did the deed, i.e. Grok in this case. You're arguing my point for me. Just because you do something for someone else doesn't mean you're absolved of responsibility. You can't build a tool with a "create child porn" button and then expect not to get into trouble for helping people make child porn.