| ▲ | joe_mamba 5 hours ago | |
>Apart from doom wasn't producing illegal content. Sure but where's the proof that Grok is actually producing illegal content? I searched for news sources, but they're just all parroting empty accusations not concrete documented cases. | ||
| ▲ | pasc1878 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
See https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg1mzlryxeo Note that IWF is not a random charity it works with the Police on these matters. I found this as the first item in Kagi search - perhaps you should try non AI searches | ||
| ▲ | KaiserPro 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> but they're just all parroting empty accusations not concrete documented cases. In the UK it is illegal to create, distribute and store CSAM. A news site printing a photo CSAM would make them legally up the shitter. However, the IWF, who are tasked with detecting this stuff have claimed to have found evidence of it, along with multiple other sources, Ofcom who are nominally supposed to police this have an open investigation, so do the irish police. The point is, law has a higher threshold of proof than news, which takes time. If there is enough evidence, then a court case (or other instrument) will be invoked. | ||