| ▲ | pinkgolem 6 hours ago | |||||||
I would argue the opposite.. What you get right now is mass replicated software, just another copy of sap/office/Spotify/whatever That software is not made individually for you, you get a copy like millions of other people and there is nearly no market anymore for individual software. Llms might change that, we have a bunch of internal apps now for small annoying things.. They all have there quirks, but are only accessible internally and make life a little bit easier for people working for us. Most of them are one shot llms things, throw away if you do not need it anymore or just one shoot again | ||||||||
| ▲ | Cthulhu_ 6 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
The question is whether that's a good thing or not; software adages like "Not Invented Here" aren't going to go away. For personal tools / experiments it's probably fine, just like hacking together something in your spare time, but it can become a risk if you, others, or a business start to depend on it (just like spare time hacked tools). I'd argue that in most cases it's better to do some research and find out if a tool already exists, and if it isn't exactly how you want it... to get used to it, like one did with all other tools they used. | ||||||||
| ||||||||