| ▲ | trhway 7 hours ago | |||||||
>That would make your solar panel (40kg) around $60K to put into space. with the GPU costing the same, it would only double the capex. >Even being generous and assuming you could get it to $100 per kg that's still $4000 noise compare to the main cost - GPUs. >There's a lot of land in the middle of nowhere that is going to be cheaper than sending shit to space. Cheapness of location of your major investment - GPUs - may as well happen to be secondary to other considerations - power/cooling capacity stable availability, jurisdiction, etc. | ||||||||
| ▲ | estomagordo 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
> with the GPU costing the same, it would only double the capex. Yes, only doubling the capex. With the benefits of, hmm, no maintenance access and awful networking? | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | blackoil 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Any idea, what is the estimated cost of a Google TPU. It may not make sense for Nvidia retail price but at cost price of Google. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | iso1631 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
> jurisdiction This is the big thing, but Elon's child porn generator in orbit will be subject to US jurisdiction, just as much as if they were in Alaska. I guess he can avoid state law. If jurisdiction is key, you can float a DC in international waters on a barge flying the flag of Panama or similar flag of convenience which you can pretty much buy at this scale. Pick a tin-pot country, fling a few million to the dictator, and you're set - with far less jurisdiction problems than a US, Russia, France launched satellite. | ||||||||