Car manufacturers are required to add features to make it less likely that cars kill babies.

What would happen if Volvo made a special baby-killing model with extra spikes?

_trampeltier 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Tesla did, the main reason, why there are no Cybertrucks in europe. They are not allowed, because they are to dangerous.

	▲	emsign 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Comparing Apples and Oranges. Defending this company is becoming cringe and ridiculous. X effed up, and Musk did it on purpose. He uses CSAM to strongman the boundaries of the law. That's not worth defending unless you also say eff the rule of law.

▲

vintermann 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Aren't a lot of US pickup trucks basically that? Sure, maybe there's a mechanism for preventing you from installing a baby seat in reverse to position in front of an airbag, but they're also built so that you can't see anything adult human sized 15m in front of the car, let alone anything child-sized.

	▲	direwolf20 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Those are illegal in France so what's your point here

▲

lmm 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The US would spend 20 years arguing about which agency's jurisdiction it was, and ignore the dead babies?

No, wait, Volvo is European. They'd impose a 300% tariff and direct anyone who wanted a baby-killing model car to buy one from US manufacturers instead.