Remix.run Logo
matt-p 11 hours ago

(DTC) Datacentres take electricity and turn it into low grade heat e.g 60c water. Put them anywhere where you've either got excess (cheap) energy or where you can use the heat. Either is fine, both is great, but neither is both bad and current standard practice.

It's perfectly possible to put small data centres in city centres and pipe the heat around town, they take up very very little space and if you're consuming the heat, you don't need the noisy cooling towers (Ok maybe a little in summer).

Similarly if you stick your datacentre right next to a big nuclear power plant, nobody is even going to notice let alone care.

MengerSponge 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Resistive heating is a tremendously inefficient way to generate heat. Sometimes it's worth it if you get something useful in exchange (such as full spectrum light in the winter). But it's not all upsides.

Heat pumps are magic. They're something like 300% efficient. Each watt generates 3 watts of useful heat.

lambertsimnel 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I share your enthusiasm about heat pumps, but I wonder what the efficiency of using waste heat is. Couldn't it be competitive with heat pumps? As it's a waste product, isn't it reasonable to also expect it to be more than 100% efficient?

matt-p 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

As a rule of thumb (obviously it varies) you spend about 1% pumping water round a heat network. So your CoP is around 99 if you consider heat truly free. It's actually higher as pump energy largely is converted to friction/heat.

CorrectHorseBat 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Much more than 100% since the only energy you need to put in is for pumping the hot water around.

HDThoreaun 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Its not inefficient if you were creating the heat anyway, its a completely free byproduct.

matt-p 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Yeah. This. Obviously if the objective is just to generate heat only buy a heat pump and not a B200!