Uh, I'd say that something has in fact been lost in that every single printer sold watermarks every document printed regardless of if you are attempting to print a $50 bill or not.

There are plenty of people who change their behavior because that tracking is in place, regardless of if what they are doing (or would be doing) is in any way illegal.

Terrible example IMO.

▲

WillAdams an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Moreover, every person who has mostly printed in b/w on a colour device, but then been blocked by printing because the yellow cartridge has been emptied printing such watermarks is negatively affected by this.

▲

slg 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

>regardless of if you are attempting to print a $50 bill or not.

Maybe the way this applies to everything should be an indication that it's unrelated to the point I made about blocking the printing of certain things.

▲

Tostino 12 hours ago | parent [-]

The ways that i've seen proposed for the 3d printer to determine if the thing you are printed is "gun related" was to force them to be internet connected, and to send your print files to some 3rd party (or government) server before you are allowed to print.

How is that less invasive?

	▲	slg 12 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The proposed legislation is suggesting nothing of the sort. If a manufacturer wants to handle this by sending everything through their own server (something some manufacturers have tried absent any regulation), that is a choice that they're making and your complaint should be with them.