| ▲ | m463 16 hours ago | |||||||
there was an article recently about a company wanting to put nuclear reactors at the bottom of very deep boreholes (like km deep). I thought that was actually quite interesting/practical, because if there is a problem, you can just bury the problem. not like tmi/fukushima/chernobyl | ||||||||
| ▲ | DaedalusII 13 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Interesting idea. 2km deep could work. I'm not sure how cooling or maintenance would work. Depth below surface | Typical temperature (°C) | Indicative cost to drill 1.2 m diameter hole 500 m | 15–25 | $5–10 million 1 km | 25–40 | $10–20 million 2 km | 50–70 | $25–45 million 3 km | 75–100 | $50–80 million 4 km | 100–130 | $90–140 million 5 km | 130–160 | $150–250 million | ||||||||
| ||||||||