|
| ▲ | anigbrowl an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| I think the implication of the fighter jets is that they force the plane to land within a particular jurisdiction (where he is then arrested) rather than allowing it to just fly off to somewhere else. Similar to the way that a mall security guard might arrest a shoplifter; the existence of security guards doesn't mean the mall operators are planning to murder you. |
| |
| ▲ | zzrrt 22 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Guards can plausibly arrest you without seriously injuring you. But
according to https://aviation.stackexchange.com/a/68361 there are no safe options if the pilot really doesn’t want to comply, so there is no “forcing” a plane to land somewhere, just making it very clear that powerful people really want you to stop and might be able to give more consequences on the ground if you don’t. |
|
|
| ▲ | ozim 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Don’t forget that captain of the plane makes decisions not Elon. If captain of the plane disobeyed direct threat like that from a nation, his career is going to be limited. Yeah Elon might throw money at him but that guy is most likely never allowed again to fly near any French territory. I guess whole cabin crew as well . Being clear for flying anywhere in the world is their job. Would be quite stupid to loose it like truck driver DUI getting his license revoked. |
| |
| ▲ | gruez 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | >Don’t forget that captain of the plane makes decisions not Elon. >If captain of the plane disobeyed direct threat like that from a nation, his career is going to be limited. Yeah Elon might throw money at him but that guy is most likely never allowed again to fly near any French territory. I guess whole cabin crew as well . Again, what's France trying to do? Refuse entry to France? Why do they need to threaten shooting down his jet for that? Just harassing/pranking him (eg. "haha got you good with that jet lmao")? |
|