They wrote "Bush was right wing" (unless it was edited), so what's your point in saying "Many aspects of Bush (assuming GW here) would be considered not in line with America's far-right today." ?

▲

ahmeneeroe-v2 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Nope no stealth edit, my bad.

My point still stands, "politics change and assessments of politicians change accordingly".

Bill Clinton's crime bill would be considered far right today.

Ronald Regean's amnesty bill would be considered far left today.

▲

southerntofu 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Even at the time Bill Clinton was already very much right-wing. When he was in power, he oversaw the destruction of public services and the introduction of neoliberalism. Is that not right-wing?

It's not just me saying this. Ask anyone who was politically active (as a leftist) in the 90s. I'm not sure what was the equivalent of the Democratic Socialists of America (center-left) at that time, but i'm sure there was an equivalent and Bill Clinton was much more right-wing. That's without mentioning actual left-wing parties (like communists, anarchists, black panthers etc).

	▲	5upplied_demand 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> Even at the time Bill Clinton was already very much right-wing. He raised taxes, lowered military spending, and pursued universal healthcare. Those are not, and have never been, right-wing stances in the US.
	▲	ahmeneeroe-v2 5 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		>Is that not right-wing? I don't think many self-described "right-leaning" people would have called Clinton "right wing" in the 90s. I 100% see your point and agree with you that he had major policies that I would call right wing today.