▲ whispem 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yes, I know. I had the opportunity to request a review of my first post (which was flagged) following my email to the moderators of HN. After checking, the moderator told me to redo a post because indeed I was wrongly flagged by some people here.

▲ forgotpwd16 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

>All the code, architecture, logic, and design in minikv were written by me, 100% by hand.

Why people always lie with this? Especially in this case that they uploaded the entire log:

  Date:   Sat Dec 6 16:08:04 2025 +0100
      Add hashing utilities and consistent hash ring
  Date:   Sat Dec 6 16:07:24 2025 +0100
      Create mod.rs for common utilities in minikv
  Date:   Sat Dec 6 16:07:03 2025 +0100
      Add configuration structures for minikv components
  Date:   Sat Dec 6 16:06:26 2025 +0100
      Add error types and conversion methods for minikv
  Date:   Sat Dec 6 16:05:45 2025 +0100
      Add main module for minikv key-value store

And this goes on until project is complete (which probably took 2~3h total if sum all sessions). Doubt learned anything at all. Well, other than that LLMs can solo complete simple projects.

Comments in previous submission are also obviously AI generated. No wonder was flagged.

▲

kryptiskt 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It looks like that if you want logically separated commits from a chunk of programming you have done. Stage a file or a hunk or two, write commit message, commit, rinse and repeat.

▲

yes_man 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You have never split your working tree changes into separate commits?

▲

forgotpwd16 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Irrelevant question. In README has:

>Built in public as a learning-by-doing project

So, either the entire project was already written and being uploaded one file at the time (first modification since lowest commit mentioned is README update: https://github.com/whispem/minikv/commit/6fa48be1187f596dde8..., clearly AI generated and clearly AI used has codebase/architecture knowledge), and this claim is false, or they're implementing a new component every 30s.

▲

whispem 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I had the opportunity to request a review of my first post (which was flagged) following my email to the moderators of HN. I didn’t use AI for the codebase, only for .md files & there's no problem with that. My project was reviewed by moderators, don't worry. If the codebase or architecture was AI generated this post would not have been authorized and therefore it would not have been published.

▲

skylurk 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

How does this deleted fix_everything.sh fit in to your story?

https://github.com/whispem/minikv/commit/6e01d29365f345283ec...

▲

whispem 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I don't see the problem to be honest

	▲	skylurk 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Hmm. You doth protest too much, methinks :)

▲

rollulus 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I thought that your “background in literature” contributed to the “well-written docs”, but that was LLMs!

	▲	whispem 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		No, I was helped (.md files only) by AI to rewrite but the majority of the doc is written by myself, I just asked for help from the AI for formatting for example.

▲

johnbellone 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I am not going to pretend to know what this person did, but I've definitely modified many things at once and made distinct commits after the fact (within 30s). I do not find it that abnormal.

▲

whispem 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Thanks a lot! I make distinct commits "every 30s" because I'm focused and I test my project. If the CI is green, I don't touch of anything. If not, I work on the project until the CI is fully green.

	▲	jabron an hour ago \| parent [-]
		What does that mean? You got feedback from the CI within 30 seconds and immediately pushed a fix?