> when notified, doing nothing about it

When notified, he immediately:

  * "implemented technological measures to prevent the Grok account from allowing the editing of images of real people in revealing clothing" - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce8gz8g2qnlo 

  * locked image generation down to paid accounts only (i.e. those individuals that can be identified via their payment details).

Have the other AI companies followed suit? They were also allowing users to undress real people, but it seems the media is ignoring that and focussing their ire only on Musk's companies...

▲ afavour a day ago | parent | next [-]

You and I must have different definitions of the word “immediately”. The article you posted is from January 15th. Here is a story from January 2nd:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c98p1r4e6m8o

> Have the other AI companies followed suit? They were also allowing users to undress real people

No they weren’t? There were numerous examples of people feeding the same prompts to different AIs and having their requests refused. Not to mention, X was also publicly distributing that material, something other AI companies were not doing. Which is an entirely different legal liability.

▲

chrisjj a day ago | parent | next [-]

> Which is an entirely different legal liability.

In UK, it is entirely the same. Near zero.

Making/distributing a photo of a non-consenting bikini-wearer is no more illegal when originated by computer in bedroom than done by camera on public beach.

▲

lokar 19 hours ago | parent [-]

I thought this was about France

	▲	chrisjj 19 hours ago \| parent [-]
		It was... until it diverted. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46870196

▲

bonesss a day ago | parent | prev [-]

The part of X’s reaction to their own publishing I’m most looking forward to seeing in slow-motion in the courts and press was their attempt at agency laundering by having their LLM generate an apology in first-person.

“Sorry I broke the law. Oops for reals tho.”

▲ freejazz 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Kiddie porn but only for the paying accounts!

	▲	moorebob an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Who's going to provide their payment details and then generate kiddie porn? This is a pretty pragmatic move by Musk. It's basically a honey trap, the likes of which authorities legitimately use to catch criminals.

▲ derrida a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The other LLMs probably don't have the training data in the first place.

	▲	chrisjj a day ago \| parent [-]
		Er... "Study uncovers presence of CSAM in popular AI training dataset" https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/20/csam_laion_dataset/.

▲ techblueberry a day ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]