Worse than the Superconducting Supercollider?

Yes far worse, the superconducting supercollider produced science which has debatable value. There’s an argument we lost nothing by canceling the project.

Wind farms produce electricity which pays for the investment when you finish but pays nothing when a stop early. This makes stopping early extremely economically harmful.

▲

watersb 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Esoteric programming language developed for the superconducting super collider, Glish, was picked up by the National Radio Astronomy Observatory, which used it well into the 2000s.

Glish supported networked remote procedure calls, made then almost transparent to the program. Otherwise, Glish was roughly similar to Tcl or Lua.

I don't know what other bits and pieces got salvaged from the SSC project.

	▲	shawn_w 9 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Documentation etc: https://www.cv.nrao.edu/glish/papers/index.html

▲

willis936 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The effective electricity rate in MA is already $0.37/kWh. How much further could it go?

	▲	_aavaa_ 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		That’s a joke right?

▲

4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]

▲

xeonmc 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Or that space telescope?