| ▲ | bigstrat2003 2 hours ago | |||||||
It's a reasonable goal, but I think that one can find better ways to meet that goal than making manufacturers responsible for what the owner of the equipment does with it. That method is just insanely unfair to the manufacturer. | ||||||||
| ▲ | idiotsecant an hour ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Can you point to a single case where a manufacturer was held responsible for what the owner of the equipment did with it? | ||||||||
| ||||||||