|
| ▲ | bryanlarsen 12 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| Even better example, I don't think systemd-boot is broadly adopted yet although there are certainly some distributions that use it. |
|
| ▲ | 5G_activated 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| and grub is a rotting pile while systemd-boot is a simple boot entry multiplexer that rides off the kernel's capability of being run as an EFI executable, it just happens to live in systemd's tree. not a good example |
| |
| ▲ | fragmede 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's a pretty good example of why people think systemd is bloated and does too much. It's a simple boot entry multiplexer. Does it need to live in systemd's tree? | | |
| ▲ | bryanlarsen an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Nobody complains about a very wide variety of only vaguely related utilities being in the Gnu coreutils tree. | | |
| ▲ | Foxboron an hour ago | parent [-] | | Nor the 20 or so odd reimplementations of various filesystem drivers and LUKS encryption in the grub2 tree. But, who is counting? |
| |
| ▲ | 5G_activated an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | so its a marketing problem, irregardless of whether it's in systemd's tree because the systemd maintainers want to maintain it in-tree |
|
|
