| ▲ | cf100clunk 5 hours ago |
| I don't see how this relates to removing SysVinit support from LFS. Choice is good. |
|
| ▲ | reppap 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Are you entitled to the LFS developers time? They build the system they get to make into what they want. |
|
| ▲ | preisschild 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| That "choice" still has to be maintained. And why spend effort when you can do the same things + more with systemd? |
| |
| ▲ | cf100clunk 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Clearly there are lots of people who don't want something that does what you say systemd does. Bravo that choice is out there, but what a pity that LFS does not seem to have the resources to test future versions for SysVinit. | | |
| ▲ | PunchyHamster 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | you can fork it and do it. But frankly if goal is to learn people about how Linux works, having SysV there is opposite to that goal |
|
|
