| ▲ | sharperguy 14 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I still wonder about that. I don't have a contract with the advertiser to provide genuine data back about what ads I've clicked and what I haven't. The website operator does have such a contract and so cannot hire a bot farm to spam click the ads. If it's something that's been held up in court already then of course I have to accept it, but I can't say the reason seems immediately intuitive. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | direwolf20 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There's a very general law that says something about using a computer to cause money to move | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | gruez 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
>I don't have a contract with the advertiser to provide genuine data back about what ads I've clicked and what I haven't. Charges of fraud doesn't require a contract to be in place. That's the whole point of criminal law, it's so that you don't need to add a "don't screw me over" clause to every interaction you make. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||