| ▲ | senderista 3 hours ago | |
Umbra is not an in-memory database (Hyper was). TUM gave up on the feasibility of in-memory databases several years ago (when the price of RAM relative to storage stopped falling). | ||
| ▲ | cmrdporcupine 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |
Yeah I think the way Umbra was pitched when I watched the talks and read the paper was as more as "hybrid" in the sense that it aimed for something close to in-memory performance while optimizing the page-in/page-out performance profile. The part of Umbra I found interesting was the buffer pool, so that's where focused most of my attention when reading though. | ||